Huggett v. Kelly
Under Watkins v. Ackley, 370 Or. 604, 523 P.3d 86 (2022), petitioners are eligible for post-conviction relief when their cases were decided by nonunanimous jury verdicts, unless the State raises a procedural defense.
Area(s) of Law:- Post-Conviction Relief
Jones v. Brown
Under Watkins v. Ackley, 370 Or. 604, 523 P.3d 86 (2022), the Court held that Ramos applied to all decisions decided by nonunanimous juries, even if the decisions were finalized before Ramos.
Area(s) of Law:- Post-Conviction Relief
Picker v. Dep鈥檛 of Revenue
鈥淲here payment of the [disputed] tax, penalty, and interest would be an undue hardship, plaintiff may file an affidavit alleging undue hardship.鈥 ORS 305.419(3).
Area(s) of Law:- Tax Law
Scott-Schwalbach v. Rosenblum
For a certified ballot title, 鈥淭he caption must 鈥榬easonably identif[y] the subject matter鈥; 鈥渢he 鈥榶es鈥 result statement鈥 must state 鈥渢he result鈥 of measure approval; and the summary must summarize the 鈥渕easure and its major effect.鈥 ORS 250.035(2)(a), (b), and (d).
Area(s) of Law:- Ballot Titles
State v. Martin
鈥淎 parolee must have an opportunity to be heard and to show . . . if he did [violate parole conditions], that circumstances in mitigation suggest that the violation does not warrant revocation.鈥 Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 488 (1972).
Area(s) of Law:- Constitutional Law
Watkins v. Ackley
Under ORS 138.530(1)(a), post-conviction relief based on the denial of constitutional rights is appropriate when the rights at issue are 鈥渃onsequential in the criminal [] proceeding鈥 and 鈥渙ffensive to our judicial sense of fairness.鈥 Brooks v. Gladden, 226 Or 191, 204 (1961) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Area(s) of Law:- Habeas Corpus
State v. H.D.E.
鈥淸A] person initiates [a] false report 鈥榠f the person falsely alleges new circumstances to which the law enforcement agency is reasonably likely to respond as a current separate crime or emergency itself.鈥欌 State v. Branch, 362 Or 351, 368 (2018).
Area(s) of Law:- Criminal Law
State v Delaney
Under ORS 132.560(3), a court may sever claims from joinder when 鈥渢he state or defendant is substantially prejudiced by a joinder of offenses . . .鈥
Area(s) of Law:- Criminal Procedure
Jimenez v. Dep鈥檛 of Revenue
ORS 305.437(2) provides, in pertinent part, 鈥(a) A taxpayer鈥檚 position is 鈥榝rivolous鈥 if there was no objectively reasonable basis for asserting that position[; and] (b) 鈥榌p]osition鈥 means any . . . argument asserted by a taxpayer without regard to any other . . . argument asserted by the taxpayer.鈥
Area(s) of Law:- Tax Law
Skinner and Skinner
鈥淸W]here a money award has been modified on appeal and the only action necessary in the trial court is compliance with the mandate of the appellate court, then the interest on the award, as modified, should run from the date of the original judgment.鈥 Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc., 329 Or. 369 (1999).
Area(s) of Law:- Civil Law
State v. Colgrove
ORS 138.105(5) states 鈥淸t]he appellate court has no authority to review the validity of the defendant鈥檚 plea of guilty or no contest, or a conviction based on the defendant鈥檚 plea of guilty or no contest.鈥
Area(s) of Law:- Appellate Procedure