杏十八新茶分享

 

State v. Witherspoon

Summarized by:

  • Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
  • Area(s) of Law: Criminal Procedure
  • Date Filed: 06-06-2012
  • Case #: A143178
  • Judge(s)/Court Below: Armstrong, P.J. for the Court; Haselton, C.J.; and Edmonds, S.J.

Two criminal counts which arose from continuous, uninterrupted conduct that were joined in time, place, and circumstances are not separate criminal episodes for the purpose of calculating defendant's criminal history score.

Defendant appealed his criminal convictions. One evening, Defendant pulled his wife鈥檚 (M) hair, which aggravated a bulging disc in her neck; attempted to force M to stab Defendant; prevented M from calling the police; threw M against a book shelf; and smashed C鈥檚 (M鈥檚 son) face into a ladder. The State charged, inter alia, and convicted Defendant of misdemeanor fourth-degree assault, menacing, and fourth-degree assault. The State then argued, and the Trial Court agreed, that there was a break in time between the knife incident and when Defendant threw M into the bookshelf and, therefore, Defendant鈥檚 criminal history score on the latter incident should be 鈥淒鈥 rather than 鈥淚鈥 pursuant to OAR 213-004-0008. Defendant appealed and the Appellate Court held that there was no evidence to support the trial court鈥檚 conclusion that the series of events was interrupted, which would allow a calculation of Defendant鈥檚 criminal history score as 鈥淒鈥 instead of 鈥淚.鈥 Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Advanced Search


Back to Top