杏十八新茶分享

 

SOFA Entertainment v. Dodger Productions

Summarized by:

  • Court: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Archives
  • Area(s) of Law: Copyright
  • Date Filed: 03-11-2013
  • Case #: 10-56535; 10-57071
  • Judge(s)/Court Below: Circuit Judge Trott for the Court; Circuit Judges O鈥橲cannlain and Clifton

The 鈥渇air use鈥 doctrine of 17 U.S.C. 搂 17 protects the use of a short television clip in an autobiographical production when use of the clip is for historical significance and its use does not usurp the demand for the original clip.

SOFA Entertainment, Inc., as owner to the rights of The Ed Sullivan Show, sued for copyright infringement when Dodger Productions, Inc. and Dodger Theatricals, Ltd. included a 鈥渟even-second clip of Ed Sullivan鈥檚 introduction of the Four Seasons鈥 in Jersey Boys, its Four Seasons autobiographical production. Dodger asserted a defense of 鈥渇air use鈥 under 17 U.S.C 搂 107. The district court granted Dodger鈥檚 motion for summary judgment and awarded attorneys鈥 fees, both of which SOFA appealed. Section 107 provides four factors: (1) purpose and character of the use; (2) nature of the copyrighted work; (3) amount and substantiality of the portion used; and (4) market effect. As to the first factor, the clip was used as a 鈥渂iographical anchor鈥 as to make the inclusion a 鈥渢ransformative鈥 use of the clip. The nature of the clip conveyed facts instead of fictional stories, which placed it outside the 鈥渃ore of intended copyright protection鈥 under factor two. Factor three concerns the 鈥渜uantitative amount and qualitative value of the original鈥 compared to the 鈥渄efendant鈥檚 justification for the use.鈥 The Court disagreed with SOFA鈥檚 argument that the clip infringed on Sullivan鈥檚 distinctive introduction because Sullivan鈥檚 action was simply an identification and SOFA was attempting to protect Sullivan鈥檚 charismatic personality, which is not copyrightable. As to factor four, the clip did not impact the market for the original or deprive SOFA of derivative use because the clip was only seven seconds, only appeared once, and was not available for repeat viewings through distribution. The Ninth Circuit upheld the attorneys鈥 fees, noting that 鈥渁 fee award encourages a defendant to litigate a meritorious fair use claim against an unreasonable claim of infringement,鈥 which furthers the purpose of the Copyright Act to 鈥渆ncourage the production of original literary, artistic, and musical expression for the good of the public.鈥 AFFIRMED.

Advanced Search


Back to Top