杏十八新茶分享

 

Marsh v. County of San Diego

Summarized by:

  • Court: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Archives
  • Area(s) of Law: Constitutional Law
  • Date Filed: 05-29-2012
  • Case #: 11-55395
  • Judge(s)/Court Below: Chief Judge Kozinski for the Court; Circuit Judges Wardlaw and Paez

"The Constitution protects a parent's rights to control the physical remains, memory and images of a deceased child against unwarranted public exploitation by the government."

Brenda Marsh brought suit against the County of San Diego (鈥渢he County鈥), alleging that the County violated her due process rights when a former Deputy District Attorney gave autopsy photos of her son to news media. Marsh appealed the district court鈥檚 grant of summary judgment in favor of the County. In this case of first impression, the Court held that 鈥渢he Constitution protects a parent鈥檚 rights to control the physical remains, memory and images of a deceased child against unwarranted public exploitation by the government.鈥 The Court based this ruling on Supreme Court precedent on similar common law rights, and the finding that such right is 鈥渄eeply rooted in this nation鈥檚 history and tradition鈥 as it relates to the two privacy rights under the 14th Amendment. However, the Court affirmed the grant of summary judgment in favor of the County, because Marsh failed to allege 鈥渁ny misconduct by any person who, at the time of the alleged misconduct, was a government official.鈥 Because she failed to prove that the right was violated under the color of state law, her 搂 1983 claim failed. Additionally, because the constitutional right at issue was not 鈥渃learly established鈥 before this ruling, the former Deputy District Attorney accused of violating Marsh鈥檚 right to privacy over her child鈥檚 death images was entitled to qualified immunity. AFFIRMED.

Advanced Search


Back to Top